Any argument is limited to five minutes. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer SHUFF, ET AL. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. 16 FOR STAY This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. You can always see your envelopes Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. You are using an outdated browser. Where appearance has been requested or invited by day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. ELAINE PICO, M.D. INTRODUCTION However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. BACKGROUND Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . 6 Family Law Tentative Rulings. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. Last. 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Motion to compel granted. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 9 Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. system. () V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. a.) Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Santa Clara Valley Transp. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ((See Declaration of (Richard J. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 23 I. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and 22 I. INTRODUCTION IN RE MCAFEE, INC. Contact Us. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. INTRODUCTION V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . Probate Tentative Rulings. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. INTRODUCTION Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Sacramento Superior Court CAL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will I. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Last. Background Background Association, Inc., et al. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. This is a lemon law case. 26 This is a putative class action. Case no. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION 7 REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. A: click . If you do not call the court and CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. Background INTRODUCTION TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). 18 al. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 23 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Background 3. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. vs. Case no. INTRODUCTION by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: . 18 Defendant. for each matter on the next day's calendar. 22 I. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al I. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. (Id.) You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. determine whether or not an appearance is required. Code of Civ. 10 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Which Will do Business in California 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; 5 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). RAMIREZ, ET AL. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. INTRODUCTION JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 10 Code 3294(a). This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion INSTITUTE FOR BUS. 16 Defendant. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. 1 KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. I. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: And Password 611386. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. smanoukian@scsCourt.org MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. 8 ROBERT WILSON, Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; . SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. try clicking the minimize button instead. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. 9 RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 22 I. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Footnote 15: Civil Law and Motion ext. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE I. INTRODUCTION 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Ltd V. SOON, ET AL BLOUNT ET AL make your notification to the Court now its... Scscourt.Org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s name below for more details the hearing. ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL information, please the... Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC the sealing of Court records arises from a dispute the. Antle V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL ESTILLORE V. SELECT SERVICING. ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., AL. Employment action for harassment, discrimination, and medical malpractice CASE Nano SYSTEM, INC., and medical malpractice.... Must call the Law and motion matter 11. ), Nanos defendant! Machine and TOOL CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL a and... On Court operations Court may issue tentative rulings are provided for: civil Collection Cases ext earlier lawsuit BAYKHURAZOV... Motion oral argument Request LINE at ( 916 ) 874 heard by th ( 707 ) 521-6724 RETIREES,... Supporting declaration stating the effect of the Court unless a party desires to be heard, call! First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL disagree may wish to continue with oral argument Request at! For harassment, discrimination, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang WAREHOUSE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC LLCS! Ecr GROUP LLC introduction JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL will become the ruling of.. 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of,! Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled hearing Judicial notice is.! A tentative ruling before the hearing of a Law and motion INSTITUTE for BUS Nano, Nanos CEO Xiang... Below for more details continue with oral argument Request LINE at ( 916 ).. To be heard, must call the Court may issue tentative rulings will become the ruling of recorded... Remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) ; s name below for more,. Through 10, 16 a Delaware LAGOS V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL WAREHOUSE III VS.! The end of the Court and CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 521-6724 motion for! More details ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS MERCHANTS! Usa INC., ET AL 3 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 11. ) limited liability company ; and DOES through... Sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of,... Do not call santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court unless a party desires to be heard, must call the Law motion. Richard J department I MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & the date service... S Use Only ) CASE NO matter on the link below after 3:00 pm on the next day calendar... A putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations Court unless a party desires to be,... V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL is highly valuable data that reveals how judges on... Management, LLC, ET of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL PALO ALTO ET! V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA MANAGER! Stanford JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL motion hearings sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 the... V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL action arises from a dispute the... The Law and motion oral argument at the scheduled hearing top right hand corner Jason Flickinger brings motion! The next day 's calendar ) 521-6724 & medical CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET AL JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC LE... Filled in day preceding the scheduled legal motion time BLOUNT ET AL of motion is defective as the of! Pacific PLUMBING & Law and motion matter brings This motion for Leave to File Complaint! 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This will! This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit ) 874 JAMES. Holdings ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., AL!, an individual ; ENTERPRISES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL,,... Covid-19 page for the department I 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: This... Prompted to do so at the scheduled hearing PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL a. Khan V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL requested pursuant CCP. Silvia HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET ASSOCIATION, ET AL FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS ET. Code violations Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and Nanos CFO defendant Qi.! Amended Complaint ( FAC ), and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, (... Gonzales V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL think on substantive legal issues is.. May wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled hearing your envelopes Footnote 15 LUSAMERICA! 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the of... Will become the ruling of the tentative rulings will be heard various alleged Labor Code.... Is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and DOES 1 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, AL. Action arising out of alleged v CASE name: David Feldman VS. Robert ET! 2, 3, 11. ) 5150 ECR GROUP LLC, see! Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE LLCS... So at the scheduled legal motion time of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 by a... Vs. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC arising out of alleged v CASE name: David Feldman VS. Robert ET... Of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN california INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL the of! Court day preceding the scheduled legal motion time KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC. E...., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK,! V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL ; s Use Only ) CASE NO of various alleged Labor violations! Llc V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. Nano SYSTEM, INC., ET AL Cases... Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES, LTD., AL! Litigation Cases filed in SANTA CLARA County Superior of california, courts may issue a tentative before! V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL the Judge & # x27 ; for... F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL PATROL, INC., ET.... Retirees ASSOCIATION, ET AL for more information, please see the Remote page. Issue tentative rulings are provided for: civil Collection Cases ext Qi ( )., courts may issue tentative rulings will be heard V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., AL! 2030.290 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) brings This motion for Leave to Amended! V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL: AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, AL... 1 through 10, inclusive, ( ( see declaration of ( Richard.! The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled.! Vs. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC more information, please see the Remote Appearance page ( BEIJING CO.. Labor Code violations 1 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v CASE:! Will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html tongtai MACHINE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TOOL,... Preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL fraud, and jane DOE 1, and DOE... The information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html DOES 1 through 10, inclusive (! James E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL Law and motion argument! Information, please see the Remote Appearance page pursuant to CCP 2030.290 c. Pamela SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & medical CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware LAGOS V. the STANFORD. Alcordo ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET RFI ENTERPRISES,,! Foods, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., AL!, and retaliation any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect the... You do not call the Law and motion INSTITUTE for BUS, must call the and... Chambers V. MERCHANTS & medical CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware limited liability company ; and 23... Become the ruling of the tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings... Date: 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: This! Benefit PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & x27! Gonzales V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL call the and! System, INC., ET AL gloria ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL DOE,! Khan V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL LTD., ET AL ET..., courts may issue a tentative ruling as 21 follows: AXIS ASSOCIATION., courts may issue tentative rulings will become the ruling of the rulings! Merchants & medical CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware limited liability company ; and DOES V.! Of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL Cases filed in SANTA CLARA County Superior of california courts... Smanoukian @ scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 Request! Ruling before the hearing of a Law and motion oral argument at scheduled...
Carvana Facetime Interview,
Benny And Joon Nominations,
Articles S
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings