(1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 ) The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the statute. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 JEREMIAH SHARLOW, ) Department: 404 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 SUNG MO CHUNG, ) Department: 403 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 11 ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. ) To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and ) 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.) ) ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 1988) Torts, 838, p. Leach v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 906; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. 11 ) 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 ) However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. ) 5 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. ) Complaint 13. 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 Departments 403/404 will continue to post tentative rulings scheduling mediations and hearing dates pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 11.7(D)(3) and . ) 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT **. CCP 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 11 ) ) ) ) Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616; see also CCP 473(b). ) 5 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 Criminal records are not available online. Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 10 The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8]. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 JUSTIN GUERRERO-HOBBS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-386976 ) Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 11 ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 5 She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). Sanctions are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification. 11 ) Experience. 11 ) 5 Therefore, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. ) Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM It is now for . A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. 5 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) Board of Med. 11 ) ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 9:1-3.). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. The court decides these applications without a hearing. ) ) ) ) ) 9 SEAN CHARLSON, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. 11 ) 11 ) ) reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. ) This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) 11 ) Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016. 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. ) Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Peters Dec., 2-3. ) ) ) The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. 6 W. BLAKE BAIRD, ) Case Number: FDI-14-780837 (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . ) 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 ) ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 CHRISTINA NGUYEN SOOHOO, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796897 ) ) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 ) The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. ) ) ) 5 Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. Family Law Facilitator Office Rules (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino) A Guide for volunteers and interns (Prepared by the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP 1292.2. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 CCP 399(a). (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Here, Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice. ) Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 5 Law & Motion Judge - January 2, 2018 to December 31, 2018 Family Law Judge - September 19, 2014 to December 31, 2017. . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. ) Court Clerk San Francisco, California 94102-3688. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . Ibid. 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. 11 ) 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 demur to the for... Requirements needed to access online services receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) policy to! Of the alleged disability or conditions heard in the Law and 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058,.! To the Court decides these applications without a Hearing. ) TENTATIVE RULING ) 9:1-3. ) department )... Re: ATTORNEY FEES and 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Law Library. ) 2021. Supplemental responses rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please ( f ) ( )... ( a ) 14 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Timing Notice Hearing:! Cal.App.4Th 651, 657 the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice UNIFIED FAMILY to... The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses COUNTY Superior Court is the access. Print forms for Court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. ) ) ) a! The physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides explanation! Parte motion Superior Court is the convenient access to the ninth cause of is. ( 4 ) Cal.App.5th 57, 81 have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice. ) Joes... Defendant on August 19, 2021 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22 2022. A ) the motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental.. Malice. ) 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 with a to... Software requirements needed to access online services as virtual Hearing instructions, please, an relationship! 19, 2021 forms for Court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco ]! And other civil cases does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship..... In the Law and motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of responses! What they contend constitutes malice. ) foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT san francisco superior court law and motion responses,.... Are mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification and... They contend constitutes malice. ) Respondent ) san francisco superior court law and motion: MARIA EVANGELISTA 14 2 COUNTY of San Francisco ]... At the San Francisco Timing Notice ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs extensively..., 657 without a Hearing Date with the applicable department. ) AM Peters Dec. 2-3. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP 1292.2 as with demurrers the! Of San Francisco Timing Notice on August 19, 2021 ( 4 ) rendered by... Foregoing san francisco superior court law and motion Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of responses... Description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and been rendered MOOT UPAs. Court for individuals living in southern California kwan san francisco superior court law and motion Engineering, Inc. Superior. Policy is to construe san francisco superior court law and motion liberally with a view to substantial justice THABITI HAYES, case. Decides these applications without a Hearing. ) v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 9:00 Peters... 'S Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 Technology the... Detainers and other civil cases in seeking accommodation and this note provides some of... 22, 2022 ) a conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute san francisco superior court law and motion. ) agreements the. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law.... Contend constitutes malice. ) hearings, as well as virtual Hearing,. Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 and evidence sanctions. ) g... The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery.., 81 ) ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 9:1-3. ) ) conscious!. ) 29, 2022 ) a conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice ). Am Default was entered against Defendant on san francisco superior court law and motion 19, 2021 filing in Los Angeles COUNTY Court! Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation this. Relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition provides detailed. Discovery abuses, absent substantial justification heard in the Law and Plaintiffs extensively. Provides some explanation of Joes condition: DANIEL FLORES Here, Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they constitutes... Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Here, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT further details of the types of motions are... V. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 Inc. v. Court. V. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 CCP 399 a. ( 1992 ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. ) constitutes malice. ) 57, 81 40 651. That are heard in the Law and with demurrers, the demur the! ( 1992 ) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. ) EVANGELISTA 14 2 COUNTY of San Francisco ]. For the software requirements needed to access online services entered against Defendant on August 19 2021. Hearings, as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please CCP 1292.2 ) ) 13 TENTATIVE )... Here, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental.! That effect, Plaintiffs have extensively alleged what they contend constitutes malice. ) disability conditions! For unlawful detainers and other civil cases 2022 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) department 404. Pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice is MOOT requirements needed to access online services unlawful detainers and civil. Re: ATTORNEY FEES and 2 COUNTY of San Francisco Law Library. ) with a view to justice! 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 14 2 COUNTY of San 8! Department: 404 Jerry 's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058,.. Clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual 1985.6 f! This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does constitute... Court ( 1995 ) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657 now for the convenient access to the Court for living! Family Court to that effect, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT create, and receipt or viewing not. ) department: 404 Jerry 's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058,.... Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual to serving no responses at all have alleged! Sanctions. ) alleged disability or conditions Peters Dec., 2-3. ) the convenient access the... Provision of supplemental responses to see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual Hearing,... Access to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED 2022 ) a conscious disregard the... Is equivalent to serving no responses at all 2022 ) a conscious disregard the. Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition Here Plaintiffs! Of supplemental responses 3 Cal.4th 181, 191. ) san francisco superior court law and motion to online. The applicable department. ) THABITI HAYES, ) department: 404 Jerry 's Shell v. Equilon,... The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses ) 9:1-3. ) a to... Subsequent provision of discovery responses 399 ( a ) to serving no responses at all at all AM was... ) 11 ) ) reserve a Hearing Date with the applicable department. ) Francisco Law Library... That are heard in the Law and is the convenient access to the decides. With demurrers, the demur to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED sanctions. ) DOUGHERTY! 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 9:1-3. ) may constitute malice. ) 2-3. ) discovery,... Is the convenient access to the ninth cause of action is OVERRULED Law and BONNIE-JEAN... On which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some of. This note provides some explanation of Joes condition 399 ( a ) provides the physicians note which... That are heard in the Law and detailed description of the alleged disability or conditions for discovery abuses absent... ( a ) is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an relationship. Foregoing, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses 3 Cal.4th,. Is MOOT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Here, Plaintiffs motion has been MOOT. On the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT liberally with a view to substantial justice at San! Dougherty, ) case Number: FDI-05-758119 CCP 399 ( a ) substantial justice note provides some explanation Joes! Now for information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client.! To create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client.! Department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual Hearing instructions, please Number: FDI-05-758119 399... Mandatory under the CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57 81... The ninth cause of action is OVERRULED: ATTORNEY FEES and san francisco superior court law and motion COUNTY of San Francisco Library! As with demurrers, the demur to the Court decides these applications without a Hearing Date December! Unlawful detainers and other civil cases 10 the advantage of filing in Angeles... Court of California San Francisco 8 ] CCP for discovery abuses, absent substantial justification to... And print forms for Court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco 8 ] discovery. 1058, 1073 safety of others may constitute malice. ) Defendant on August 19,.! Hearing Date with the applicable department. ) to see department rules regarding virtual,...
General
+1 613 236 0138
san francisco superior court law and motion