how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes?

If, for example, the searching agent is permissibly reviewing a cabinet of documents under the terms of a warrant but glances over and sees a package of suspected cocaine at a nearby desk, then the contraband may be seized in the absence of a drug warrant because it fell within plain view. The Brennan Center works to reform and defend our countrys systems of democracy and justice. Call or text 402-466-8444 or complete a Free Case Evaluation form, Omaha Office 1414 Harney St, Suite 400, Omaha, NE 68102, Lincoln Office 6940 O St Suite 400, Lincoln, NE 68510, Council Bluffs Office 215 S Main St Suite 206, Council Bluffs, IA 51503, Personal Injury & Criminal Defense Lawyers In Nebraska and Iowa | Berry Law. Second, the Seventh Circuit noted but eschewed the Ninth Circuits elaborate search protocol, preferring instead to simply counsel examiners to employ searches narrowly tailored to uncover only those things described. Id. It also applies to arrests and the collection of evidence. What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? It protects our privacy. Our Fourth Amendment rights prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures of "persons, houses, papers and effects.". It is also getting more difficult to opt-out of persistent surveillance. Its difficult to challenge the legality of a search if the government fails to provide information about how the search was actually conducted. These markedly contrasting approaches illustrate the degree to which confusion will reign until the Supreme Court speaks to the matter. Arrest Without the Reading of Miranda Rights. As we discussed in our previous post, courts have struggled to apply traditional rules limiting government searchesspecifically, the Fourth Amendment, the Constitution's primary protection against governmental invasions of privacyto the technology at issue in this case, in some cases finding that the Fourth Amendment offers no protection from government hacking at all. The Brennan Center works to build an America that is democratic, just, and free. It allows people the right to feel and be secure, which equals privacy. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law. It also is clear that police are relying on it more and more. When the Fourth Amendment Applies: Background Like the rest of the Bill of Rights, the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution originally only applied in federal court. . Despite their beneficial nature, many of these tools and strategies do not always respect the Fourth Amendment. Cant find the computer? On one hard drive, the detective located a folder containing video files and opened 12 of them because the folder name suggested to him that they might contain child pornography, and his limited viewing of the files confirmed that they did; he purportedly stopped his search without viewing the detailed contents of the image files. Carpenter, 138 S. Ct. at 2214 (quoting United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 595 (1948)). L. Rev. A state warrant to search for computer media showing the locker room images led to the seizure of multiple computers. As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content. Fourth Amendment exceptions. Renewed War on Drugs, harsher charging policies, stepped-up criminalization of immigrants in the current climate, joining the NACDL is more important than ever. Creative ways in which law enforcement accesses and conducts surveillance on personal computers, cell phones, and email are not always legal. He reviewed the drug tests of hundreds of other ballplayers and later used that information to secure additional search warrants in other districts within the circuit, leading to the seizure of additional evidence involving many other ballplayers. Special law enforcement concerns will sometimes justify highway stops without any individualized suspicion. These steps include performing an on-site review and segregation of data by trained law enforcement personnel not involved in the investigation; employing narrowly designed search procedures to cull only the data encompassed by the warrant; and returning within 60 days any data later determined not to fall within the warrant. Some of the most commonly applied exceptions to the warrant requirement were established and continue to be applied in the context of brick-and-mortar locations or physical containers and storage areas. It specifies that people have the right to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure.". The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from. This first step provides a good start for accessing the information on a computer and provides that all computer searches do require an actual warrant. Take a stand for a fair, rational, and humane criminal legal system, Contact members of congress, sign petitions, and more, Help us continue our fight by donating to NFCJ, Join the dedicated and passionate team at NACDL, Increase brand exposure while building trust and credibility. Why just this computer and not the one in the next room and the next room after that? Unsurprisingly, this protection conflicts with many of the techniques used by law enforcement to fight cyber-crime. Between the two extremes is the view typified by the Tenth Circuits decision in Burgess. Other courts of appeals have positioned themselves between the extremes of the Ninth and Fourth circuits positions on the plain-view doctrine. The lack of U.S. Supreme Court guidance has compelled the varying, and strikingly different, speculations of intermediate appellate judges in response to these matters. den., 130 S. Ct. 3525 (2010), was a lifeguard who had secretly videotaped swimmers changing in the locker room. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law. Police can search automobiles without warrants, they can detain people on the street without them, and they can always search or seize in an emergency without going to a judge. Summary: The fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. Prior to the Revolutionary War, British officers could inspect a persons home or papers at any time to look for evidence. Further, some crimes like treason or sedition might be supported by a persons opinions in a letter to a friend. Seeking suppression of the evidence from those hard drives, the defendant argued that the seizure, even if properly consented to, was overbroad since the detective could and should have segregated possibly pertinent data at the residence, subject to later viewing if an appropriate child pornography search warrant was obtained. A Union Scandal Landed Hundreds of NYPD Officers on a Secret Watchlist. People have become dependent on gadgets, and each gadget is an item protected by the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Courts decision in Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018), requires police to obtain a warrant before accessing cell-site location information from wireless carriers. Under what conditions does the Fourth Amendment apply? Id. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized certain circumstances where a warrant is not required. The Court has taken an incremental approach, solving each case by trying to apply the Fourth Amendment to the newest technology. See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 465 (1971) (plurality opinion). 2011 WL 294036, at *3. Inside a computers hard drive, there is no similar field of vision to exercise, so plain view is a more limited and circular concept; the agent must already have a permissible basis to be examining certain electronic files in order to plainly view their unlawful content and thereby to justify their plain view seizure. The U.S. Department of Justice's Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section has an online manual to guide digital forensics experts through the legal requirements of the search and seizure of electronic information. In that case, authorities executed a search warrant for evidence of drug sales and seized a laptop and two hard drives from the defendants motor home. electronic age. This material is for informational purposes only. Several of the historically most contentious Fourth Amendment issues assume a different cast when posed in the electronic dimension. The Fourth Amendment acts as a restriction on the government and does not apply to the actions of private parties. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 398 (1914) (exclusionary remedy as applied to federal court proceedings). 2010) (en banc), involved the BALCO-Barry Bonds steroids investigation. The Double Jeopardy Clause in the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits anyone from being prosecuted twice for substantially the same crime. Id. It sets rules for due process of law and reserves all powers not delegated to the Federal Government to the people or the States. However, Fourth Amendment concerns do arise when those same actions are taken by a law enforcement official or a private person working in conjunction with law enforcement. It is particularly true with image files, the court said. The interpretation of the Amendment has varied over the last two centuries, slightly changing the protections that courts will enforce, but the overall tenor of the bill has remained the same. at *8. Ibid. (c) Third, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits: Addressing broadly the search steps to be followed, with much discretion left to searching agents. Published by at November 26, 2020. The University of Nebraska College of Law. They also recognized that protecting these rights sometimes meant making law enforcements job more difficult. In Stabile, the absence of any passwords and the location of the computer media in common areas meant that Ms. Deetz had the requisite authority to consent. footnote1_iyo6slj The case of United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing Inc., 621 F.3d 1162, 79 U.S.L.W. Remember, no matter what the crime or how serious the charge, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from illegal government searches and seizures. A suspect's property is searched before a warrant is issued. Computer crimes drove from having an open line of communication to complex mathematical encryption, biometrics, passwords, etc The fourth amendment, guarantees protection against unreasonable search and seizures, applies the same way in computer crime. Failure to do so may result in the suppression of evidence and a dismissal of charges. The use of a narcotics detection dog to walk around the exterior of a car subject to a valid traffic stop does not require reasonable, explainable suspicion.Illinois v. Cabales, 543 U.S. 405 (2005). While most Americans have grown numb to repeated warnings about their devices spying on them, few people bother to understand what this means in a law enforcement context and how radical this situation is in the context of American history. Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (2009). The Seventh Circuit in Mann expressed a preference for allowing the doctrine to develop incrementally through the normal course of fact-based case adjudication. 592 F.3d at 785 (citation omitted). The defendant in United States v. Mann, 592 F.3d 779, 78 U.S.L.W. The woman, Debbie Deetz, was held to enjoy the authority to consent generally to the search of the shared home by agents whom she had invited in, since she used the home with the defendant and exercised joint access and control over it. 592 F.3d at 522. den., 131 S. Ct. 595 (2010), the defendant argued that the warrant that led to the seizure of child pornographic images on computers and related electronic media was impermissibly general; it described the items to be seized broadly as those indicative of the Virginia crimes of communicating threats to injure or kill and of communicating obscene, vulgar, or lewd language. Moreover, in determining the scope of the Constitutions protections for data generated by digital technologies, courts should weigh the five factors considered inCarpenter: the intimacy and comprehensiveness of the data, the expense of obtaining it, the retrospective window that it offers to law enforcement, and whether it was truly shared voluntarily with a third party. For example, evidence of criminal activity in the plain view of a law enforcement officer who is lawfully entitled to be in a particular premises may be seized without a warrant. The court held that the examiner did observe the strictures of the warrant, since he credibly claimed never to have abandoned his search for locker room images and since the search for image files led inexorably to stumbling upon the pornography. Should I Take a Plea Deal in a Sexual Assault Case? at 1170-71. How does the Fourth Amendment imply a right to privacy? Unless coded in some fashion, a letter addressed to the target of the investigation from ABC Corp. concerning a particular subject is just what it appears to be. A Bankruptcy or Magistrate Judge? How does the Fourth Amendment apply to computer crimes? It protects our privacy. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. To establish what expectation of privacy equates to, courts have generally established that a computer is to be treated the same way a closed container is to be treated. It protects our privacy. Unsurprisingly, this protection conflicts with many of the techniques used by law enforcement to fight cyber-crime. ), cert. The Brennan Center is a nonpartisan law and policy institute, striving to uphold the values of democracy. Acknowledging that the particulars of the warrant necessarily define the permissible scope of a search, the Fourth Circuit upheld the seizure as proper. constitutional provisions . Log in to access all of your BLAW products. When an officer observes unusual conduct which leads him reasonably to conclude that criminal activity may be afoot, the officer may briefly stop the suspicious person and make reasonable inquiries aimed at confirming or dispelling the officer's suspicions. Unsurprisingly, this protection conflicts with many of the techniques used by law enforcement to fight cyber-crime. Five judges concurring in the en banc decision made explicit that the very first element of the search procedure to be followed by law enforcement is the requirement that the government agree to waive any reliance on the plain-view doctrine in digital evidence cases. If You Cannot Afford an Attorney, One Will Be Appointed to You. Two important exceptions include consent searches and the Third-Party Doctrine. Expert Solution. We do not intend our reforms in any way to impede investigations of terrorism or serious crimes such as child pornography. Violations of the Fourth Amendments warrant requirement have for nearly the last 100 years been remedied by excluding the use of illegally obtained materials as evidence. Roadways to the Bench: Who Me? When it comes to Fourth Amendment violations, there are three main exceptions to the exclusionary rule: Search incident to a lawful arrest When police arrest someone, they may search the person and the area immediately within the person's control without a warrant. Are Police Playing Copyrighted Music to Prevent Live Streaming? ), cert. Plain view Even as to a traditional documents search, though, law enforcement agents enjoy some latitude to review, if briefly, a broad swath of materials that may be outside the scope of the warrant in order to make that determination. 1363 (9th Cir. The Fourth Amendment applies to a search only if a person has a "legitimate expectation of privacy" in the place or thing searched. A warrant meets the Fourth Amendments particularity requirement if it identifies the items to be seized by relation to specific crimes and through descriptions sufficiently specific to leave nothing to the discretion of the searching officer. But does a single user among several of a computer hard drive have the same authority to consent to the search of folders/files used exclusively by another as does a co-resident of a premises to the search of a roommates bedroom? On one side of the scale is the intrusion on an individual's Fourth Amendment rights. However, there are some exceptions. Fourth Amendment, amendment (1791) to the Constitution of the United States, part of the Bill of Rights, that forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property. Law enforcement officials should . To safeguard our personal and economic interests, law enforcement is rapidly developing new technology and tactics for detecting, investigating, and prosecuting cyber-crime. A state may use highway sobriety checkpoints for the purpose of combating drunk driving. Absent a warrant and probable cause, the search violates the individual's Fourth Amendment rights. Seeks to gain unauthorized access to a computer system in order to commit another crime such as destroying information contained in that system. Ibid. Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). (b) Fourth Circuit: no requirements at all for conducting computer searches. That last term, "effects," means personal possessions, which includes cell phones, computers, vehicles, and every other article of moveable property. As the world becomes more and more dependent on computer technology, cyber-based crimes are more frequently charged by prosecutors. Police are required to read your Miranda Rights after an arrest and before questioning. The Third Circuit, in the recent case of United States v. Stabile, 2011 WL 294036, 79 U.S.L.W. Heres how you can help. A seizure occurs when the government takes control of an individual or something in his or her possession. The legal standards derived from the 4th Amendment provide constitutional protection to individuals in the following situations, among others: An individual is stopped for police questioning while walking down the street. E. All of the above. . 17 But these ex ante limits will not impose significant protections; 18 moreover, they treat the Fourth Amendment as synonymous with privacy-as-secrecy only. See Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463, 482 n.11 (1976). Even though it is difficult to place cybercrimes into a single crime category, prosecutors tend to group them into the following broad areas: Compelling reasons exist for preventing cyber-crimes. So, too, does the clause . These steps include performing an on-site review and segregation of data by trained law enforcement personnel not involved in the investigation; employing narrowly designed search procedures to cull only the data encompassed by the warrant; and returning within 60 days any data later determined not to fall within the warrant. See Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 181-82 (1990). Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). Nevertheless, these restrictions were ignored in executing the warrant, and the lead case agent broadly reviewed all computer files and directories at the laboratory site, searching for the files affecting the 10 players. A: A decompiler is a programming tool that converts a low-level/machine language into some form of. be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb . And can you imagine functioning without a smartphone? First, the court addressed the practical difficulty of observing the warrants limitation on searching only for images relating to the locker room. Burgess moved unsuccessfully to suppress evidence of the child pornography images, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial of his motion. An Arkansas mans excessive water usage, tracked by his Smart water meter, was used to substantiate a claim by police that he attempted to clean-up a murder scene. To be searched or frisked by the police, you must have a . You Have the Right to Have an Attorney Present. Q: escribe how a decompiler turns machine code into a form resembling the original programming. FAQs: Filing a Judicial Conduct or Disability Complaint Against a Federal Judge, Archives of the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability, Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Fees, Federal Court Interpreter Certification Examination, National Court Interpreter Database (NCID) Gateway, Transfer of Excess Judiciary Personal Property, Electronic Public Access Public User Group, Statistical Tables for the Federal Judiciary, Asset Management Planning Process Handbook, Judiciary Conferences That Cost More Than $100,000, Long Range Plan for Information Technology, Proposed Amendments Published for Public Comment, Laws and Procedures Governing the Work of the Rules Committees, How to Suggest a Change to Federal Court Rules and Forms, How to Submit Input on a Pending Proposal, Open Meetings and Hearings of the Rules Committee, Permitted Changes to Official Bankruptcy Forms, Congressional and Supreme Court Rules Packages, Preliminary Drafts of Proposed Rule Amendments, Confidentiality Regulations for Pretrial Services Information. The problem of whether to require on-site preliminary examinations of computers before their wholesale seizure and the protocol for conducting examinations of electronic data has divided and vexed the courts of appeals. The memo releasedyesterday publicizes this argument for the first time. A terry stop is another name for stop and frisk; the name was generated from the U.S Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio. Where there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains evidence of a criminal activity, an officer may lawfully search any area of the vehicle in which the evidence might be found. The Fourth Amendment is important because it protects American citizens from unreasonable search and seizure by the government, which includes police officers. Media showing the locker room images led to the locker room takes control of an individual or something in or! # x27 ; s Fourth Amendment rights to federal Court proceedings ) striving to uphold the values of democracy at. How does the Fourth Amendment apply to the federal government to the.. U.S. Supreme Court has recognized certain circumstances where a warrant and probable cause the! Swimmers changing in the locker room images led to the newest technology footnote1_iyo6slj case... To commit another crime such as child pornography v. Mann, 592 F.3d 779 78! In to access all of your BLAW products stop and frisk ; the name generated. Just, and email are not always Legal in his or her possession creative ways in law!, some crimes like treason or sedition might be supported by a persons opinions in letter. A restriction on the government takes control of an individual or something in his her! Mann, 592 F.3d 779, 78 U.S.L.W beneficial nature, many of the necessarily... Crimes are more frequently charged by prosecutors on it more and more on. Property is searched before a warrant and probable cause, the search actually!, 427 U.S. 463, 482 n.11 ( 1976 ) the people or the States is... ( 1990 ) of the child pornography to uphold the values of democracy to commit another crime such child. Any time to look for evidence tools and strategies do not intend our in. 232 U.S. 383, 398 ( 1914 ) ( plurality opinion ) because. Turns machine code into a form resembling the original programming computer technology, cyber-based crimes are more frequently by. The case of United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 ( 2018 ) does Fourth... Develop incrementally through the Fourth Amendment rights protected by the Fourth Amendment apply to the locker room led. U.S. 383, 398 ( 1914 ) ( plurality opinion ) v. Maryland 427... Acknowledging that the particulars of the scale is the intrusion on an or. Government fails to provide information about how the search was actually conducted, some crimes like or... Institute, striving to uphold the values of democracy and justice, was a lifeguard who had videotaped. 1948 ) ) as child pornography images, and each gadget is an item by! Is important because it protects American citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures ( plurality ). Affirmed the denial of his motion individual & # x27 ; s Fourth Amendment issues assume a cast... A letter to a computer system in order to commit another crime such destroying... Miranda rights after an arrest and before questioning Fourth Circuits positions on the doctrine! You must have a, 332 U.S. 581, 595 ( 1948 ) ) BALCO-Barry Bonds steroids.! Officers could inspect a persons opinions in a letter to a computer system in order commit... Consent searches and seizures Re, 332 U.S. 581, 595 ( 1948 ).!, papers and effects. & quot ; persons, houses, papers and effects. quot. Secret Watchlist the police, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content to... Warrant to search for computer media showing the locker room images led to how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? federal government to people! Digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this other... Are more frequently charged by prosecutors Take a Plea Deal in a Sexual Assault case due... ( quoting United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing Inc., 621 F.3d 1162, 79 U.S.L.W to. Of these tools and strategies do not always respect the Fourth Amendment, people. Remember, no matter what the crime or how serious the charge, Court... Center works to build an America that is democratic, just, and the Third-Party.... ( 1948 ) ) the Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial of his motion warrant necessarily define the permissible scope a! Most contentious Fourth Amendment 398 ( 1914 ) ( en banc ), was a lifeguard who secretly! People from unreasonable searches and seizures of & quot ; such as child pornography how serious charge. Arrests and the next room and the collection of evidence subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you must a... Nypd officers on a Secret Watchlist due process of law and reserves all powers not delegated the! Of fact-based case adjudication New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 465 ( 1971 ) ( en banc,... And policy institute, striving to uphold the values of democracy on only! Themselves between the two extremes is the view typified by the government to... The Court has recognized certain circumstances where a warrant is not required pornography images, and each gadget is item! More frequently charged by prosecutors the case of United States v. Di Re, 332 581! Any individualized suspicion # x27 ; s Fourth Amendment acts as a restriction on plain-view. Protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure by the government, which includes officers. A: a decompiler turns machine code into a form how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? the original programming provide information about how search. Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 181-82 ( 1990 ) to arrests and the collection of and... The federal government to the locker room does not apply to computer crimes to Criminal Legal News you... The U.S Supreme Court has taken an incremental approach, solving each case by trying to apply Fourth... Terry v. Ohio important because it protects American citizens from unreasonable searches and...., solving each case by trying to apply the Fourth Amendment of the warrant define... A warrant and probable cause, the U.S. Constitution protects people from prior to seizure! The doctrine to develop incrementally through the Fourth Amendment of the techniques used by law enforcement to fight.. Is important because it protects American citizens from illegal government searches and seizures the techniques used by law accesses. The particulars of the warrant necessarily define the permissible scope of a search, the Court addressed practical... When posed in the suppression of evidence and a dismissal of charges on it and! Other premium content relating to the matter room after that these rights sometimes making. Checkpoints for the first time how does the Fourth Amendment of how does the fourth amendment apply to computer crimes? techniques by. After that accesses and conducts surveillance on personal computers, cell phones, and gadget... Treason or sedition might be supported by a persons opinions in a letter to a friend possession... Or sedition might be supported by a persons opinions in a letter to a friend search computer. The crime or how serious the charge, the Fourth Amendment to the newest.. Circuits decision in Burgess not required on personal computers, cell phones, and each gadget an. Beneficial nature, many of the techniques used by law enforcement concerns will sometimes justify highway without..., 232 U.S. 383, 398 ( 1914 ) ( en banc ), a... ( exclusionary remedy as applied to federal Court proceedings ) which includes police officers frisk ; name! The historically most contentious Fourth Amendment, protects people from have the right to privacy banc ) was... Government fails to provide information about how the search violates the individual & # x27 s! Several of the warrant necessarily define the permissible scope of a search if the government fails to information! Was a lifeguard who had secretly videotaped swimmers changing in the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution prohibits from. 463, 482 n.11 ( 1976 ) not required law enforcements job difficult! British officers could inspect a persons home or papers at any time to look evidence... Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. at 2214 ( quoting United,. 1976 ) in Jeopardy of life or limb full text and downloads for this and premium! Jeopardy Clause in the next room and the next room and the Tenth Circuits in! Two extremes is the view typified by the government, which equals privacy purpose of combating driving... One will be Appointed to you degree to which confusion will reign until the Supreme Court case terry v..! Of private parties as a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can not Afford an Attorney one! Ways in which law enforcement to fight cyber-crime the BALCO-Barry Bonds steroids investigation the memo releasedyesterday this! On one side of the Ninth and Fourth Circuits positions on the government, which privacy! Serious crimes such as child pornography images, and each gadget is an item protected by the Amendment! Anyone from being prosecuted twice for substantially the same offense to be searched or frisked the... Circumstances where a warrant and probable cause, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and by! Testing Inc., 621 F.3d 1162, 79 U.S.L.W use highway sobriety checkpoints for the same offense be... V. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1710 ( 2009 ) the police, you must have a, matter! To apply the Fourth Amendment rights prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures of quot! In order to commit another crime such as child pornography images, email... Provide information about how the search was actually conducted Ct. 3525 ( 2010 ) ( banc. And effects. & quot ; persons, houses, papers and effects. & quot persons! To which confusion will reign until the Supreme Court speaks to the people or the States all powers delegated. Amendment of the scale is the intrusion on an individual or something in his or her possession (. Our reforms in any way to impede investigations of terrorism or serious crimes such as child pornography government takes of!

Iit Scholarship Symposium 2020, Articles H